Impact of Campus Cohabitation on Students’ Academic Performance: A Study of Selected Institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17605/cajssh.v7i2.1303Keywords:
Campus Cohabitation, Academic Performance, Students, Higher Institutions, Peer InfluenceAbstract
Effect of Campus Cohabitation on Students Academic Performance: a Study of Selected Institutions Of Higher Learning Cohabitation has made its way into college campuses, as more students are leaving home and engaging in romantic relationships but not marrying. Data were collected from 150 students using structured questionnaires, through descriptive survey design. Keywords: Cohabitation, financial limitation, peer pressure, emotional connection, lack of parental supervision. It also goes on to show the detrimental impact of living together on academic performance through reduced study hours, higher absenteeism and emotional tension. Further statistical analysis confirmed the correlation of cohabitation with academic performance. The study suggests that increased parental support, counseling services, institutional regulations, and financial support can help counter challenges posed by cohabitation on academics.
References
M. Abdullahi, “Consequence of pre-marital sex among the youth: A study of University of Maiduguri,” IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2019.
T. D. Mashau, “Cohabitation and premarital sex amongst Christian youth in South Africa today: A theological study,” Theological Studies, 2019.
B. Kramer, “Spatial analysis of cohabiting tertiary students’ housing location in Ibadan, Nigeria,” GeoJournal, 2017.
K. Kiernan, “The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe,” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 2020.
P. O. Nyagosia, Determinants of Differential Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education Performance and School Effectiveness in Kiambu and Nyeri Counties, Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenyatta University, 2019.
R. Omonijo, “The effect of premarital cohabitation on quality of relationship and marital stability of married people in Southwest, Nigeria,” African Nebula, 2015.
L. Zheng, “Cohabitation and marital stability: Quality or commitment?” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 2016.
A. J. Cherlin, Public and Private Families: An Introduction, 8th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Education, 2016.
L. L. Bumpass and J. A. Sweet, “National estimates of cohabitation,” Demography, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 615–625, 1989.
P. R. Amato, “The consequences of divorce for adults and children,” Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1269–1287, 2000.
P. J. Smock, “Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 26, pp. 1–20, 2000.
S. L. Brown and A. Booth, “Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality,” Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 668–678, 1996.
J. R. Udry, The Social Context of Marriage. Philadelphia, PA, USA: J. B. Lippincott Company, 1971.
R. K. Raley and L. L. Bumpass, “The topography of the divorce plateau: Levels and trends in union stability in the United States after 1980,” Demographic Research, vol. 8, pp. 245–260, 2003.
World Health Organization, Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2018.


