The Role of Historical Science in The Promotion of Military Heritage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17605/cajssh.v7i2.1287Keywords:
historical science, development strategy, enlightened society, enlightened individual, Address (Presidential Address), national history, historical thinking, spiritual developmentAbstract
The evolution of historical science takes place amidst the needs of society and occupies a leading position in ensuring the protection and preservation of national memory, identity, and military-memory heritage. Research into and popularization of military heritage, especially in the context of globalization and growing ideological confrontation, is more important than ever, as it is a reminder not only of historical battles, but also traditions of heroism, devotion, resistance against oppression and national historical memory. But the most pressing challenge is ensuring that military history is interpreted in an objective, scientific manner so as to negate the ideological distortion and one sided narratives. This article fills the gap by observing the important role of historical science in promotion of military heritage, specifying the educational and methodological foundations of history studies in New Uzbekistan. The research is based on a qualitative analysis of scientific literature, special issues, and national policy documents on historical education and spiritual-moral development. The results indicate that history education plays a major role in the development of historical thinking, civic duty and identity, patriotism, and national pride among the youth, It also underscores that historical science was strictly ideologized under the Soviets, but repressions released with reforms give wider possibilities today to bring historical justice to bear, to provide humanities with research support and to modernize history education with digitization. The outcomes confirm the necessity of bolstering history education, quality and continuity of teaching In order to effectively promote military heritage and foster an enlightened society. These implications suggest that a need to maintain sufficient number of instructional hours, and updated course outlines in order to sustain the long term effect of history on national and spiritual liberation.
References
“Raqamli O‘zbekiston — 2030 strategiyasini tasdiqlash.” [Online]. Available: https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-5030957
Xalq so‘zi, “Yangi O‘zbekiston — ma’rifatli jamiyat,” Xalq So‘zi.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti, “2022–2026 yillarga mo‘ljallangan Yangi O‘zbekistonning taraqqiyot strategiyasi to‘g‘risida PF-60 sonli Farmoni.” 2022.
A. Ziyo, “Yangi O‘zbekistonda milliy tarix va milliy ruh,” Xalq So‘zi, Jul. 2021.
A. Asqarov, “O‘zbekiston mustaqilligi sharoitida tarix fanining vazifalari,” O‘zbekistonda Ijtimoiy Fanlar, no. 7–8, 1992.
H. Ziyoev, Tarix: o‘tmish va kelajak ko‘zgusi. Tashkent: G‘ofur G‘ulom nomidagi Adabiyot va san’at nashriyoti, 2000.
Sh. Mirziyoyev, “O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti Shavkat Mirziyoyevning 2018 yil Oliy Majlisga Murojaatnomasi.” Dec. 28, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://president.uz/uz/lists/view/4057
B. V. Hasanov, “O‘zbekistonda xalq ta’limi hamda fan sohasida sovet siyosati va milliy ziyolilar (20 yillarning ikkinchi yarmi–50 yillarning boshlari),” in O‘zbekiston tarixining dolzarb muammolariga yangi chizgilar: davriy to‘plam, Tashkent: Sharq, 1999, p. 177.
I. A. Karimov, O‘zbekiston mustaqilligi eng oliy qadriyatdir. Tashkent: O‘zbekiston, 1996.
R. Makhmudov, Tarix fanining metodologik masalalari. Tashkent: Fan, 2005.
O‘zbekiston Milliy Ensiklopediyasi, O‘zbekiston Milliy Ensiklopediyasi. Tashkent: O‘zbekiston Milliy Ensiklopediyasi Davlat ilmiy nashriyoti, 2000.
Sh. Abduvohidov, O‘zbekiston tarixi: XX asr boshidan hozirgacha. Tashkent: Sharq, 2010.
S. Rustamov, “Milliy ruh va tarbiya: tarix fani nuqtai nazari,” Ilmiy Axborot, 2019.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi, Ta’lim to‘g‘risida gi Qonun. Tashkent: Adliya vazirligi, 2020.
G. Smith, The Nationalities Question in the Soviet Union. London: Longman, 1990.
