Institutional Effectiveness of Community Supervisory Group (Pokmaswas) in Supervision of Illegal Fishing and Destructive Fishing in Gorontalo Province
Keywords:
illegal Fishing, Gorontalo, pokmaswasAbstract
The use and management of fisheries resources must be accompanied by maintaining and maintaining their sustainability, so that they can be used continuously or sustainably. For this reason, it is necessary to anticipate monitoring activities carried out around the area, so that they do not disturb the sustainability of fisheries resources. Supervision activities are carried out by fisheries supervisory officers who have been appointed by the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries to protect fisheries resources in Indonesia. And also the Directorate General of Marine Resources and Fisheries Control is also carrying out increased supervision by coordinating and collaborating with security forces and law enforcement at sea. However, considering the vast area of waters in Indonesia and also the limited facilities and infrastructure as well as the number of supervisory personnel are still the main obstacles in achieving optimal monitoring performance.To overcome this problem, there is a need for community involvement in carrying out monitoring activities to protect and preserve fisheries resources in their respective areas. The potential for supervisory resources in the community is quite large in assisting supervision and has also become a cultural custom in each region. We realize that traditional community involvement is a formula that needs to be developed, especially in the context of monitoring and managing fisheries resources. Therefore, community participation in implementing supervision in the field is highly expected.
References
2. Ahmad Erani Yustika. 2013. Ekonomi Kelembagaan, Paradigma, Teori, dan Kebijakan. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga
3. Amirin, T. (2011). Populasi dan sampel penelitian 4: Ukuran sampel rumus slovin.
Jakarta: Erlangga.
4. Asnawi. 2013. Efektivitas Penyelenggaraan Publik Pada Samsat Corner Wilayah Malang Kota, Astrid S. Susanto. (1975). Pendapat Umum. Bandung : Bina Cipta.
5. Effendy, Onong Uchjana. 1989. KAMUS KOMUNIKASI. Bandung : PT. Mandar Maju. Handoko, T. H. (1995). Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. 2002. Jakarta. Balai Pustaka. Hal. 284
6. Keputusan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan Nomor KEP.58/MEN/2001 Tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Sistem Pengawasan Masyarakat dalam Pengelolaan dan Pemanfaatan Sumberdaya Kelautan dan Perikanan
7. Literatur.blogspot.com/2014/12 Pengertian Efektifitas dan Landasan Teori Efektifitas dikutip dari Siaan ,2001, Hal 24. Diakses tanggal 27 juni 2018
8. Literatur.blogspot.com/2014/12 pengertian efektifitas dan landasan teori efektifitas, diakses tanggal 27 juli 2018
9. Nikijuluw, V.P.H. 2002. Rezim Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Perikanan. Kerja Sama Pusat Pemberdayaan dan Pembangunan Regional (P3R) dengan PT Pustaka Cidesindo, Jakarta.
10. Paulangan, Y.P., et. 2022. Analisis Kelembagaan Lokal Pengelolaan Calon Kawasan Konservasi Taman Pulau Kolepom Kabupaten Merauke Provinsi Papua (J.Kebijak.Perikan.Ind. Vol.14)
11. Ridwan 2007. Skala Pengukuran Variabel-variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Afabeth Ruttan, V.W. and Hayami, Y. (1984). Toward a Theory of Induced Institutional Innovation. Journal of Development Studies, 20, 203-223
12. Steers. M. Richard, 1985, Efektivitas Organisasi, Jakarta, Erlangga.
13. Sugiharto, R. (2008). Pokmaswas Banten Garda Terdepan Pengawasan Sumberdaya Kelautan dan Perikanan. Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Provinsi Banten
14. Undang-Undang No. 45 Tahun 2009 atas perubahan Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pengawasan Perikanan
15. Ulum. Ihyaul MD, 2004, Akuntansi Sektor Publik, Malang,UMM Press, Hlm. 294 Umar, Husein Umar. 2001. Strategic Management InAction. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
